As the World Stearns

Criticism, calumny, and self-indulgent twaddle about books & publishing.

Why I Read: ABDCE

with 5 comments

3musketsIf you read enough behind-the-scenes writing by famous authors, you’re probably over-familiar with the “Why I Write” essay. Sometimes these are pretty damn inspirational (I’m thinking of Paul Auster’s pieces collected in The Red Notebook), and other times a wee bit indulgent and hateful (probably best not to name names, sorry). But it is all too rare to come across an essay about why we read.

For me, it has always been about What Happens Next, about storytelling at its most fundamental, that breathless and then, and then, and then. It can be easy to forget that, sometimes—I become enamored with a writer’s wit or pyrotechnics or form-bending exercises, and I spend ages hacking through wildernesses of metafiction, giving my brain a workout on playgrounds devised by genius loons. (I’m thinking, of course, of the usual suspects: Thomas Pynchon, David Foster Wallace, Jeanette Winterson, Paul Auster—really, this shelf is endless, and endlessly fascinating.) Or I meander slowly through finely wrought character studies, in books that are about the nuances of personality and make high drama out of small moments. Whatever—these are all good, worthy books.

But while in the midst of them, I sometimes forget about the visceral joys of plain old story. Until I stumble upon it again and recall, Oh yeah! This is what it’s all about.

Which brings me to The Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas. I began reading this the other day, and it’s a struggle to pull myself away from it. Yes, it is wordy and long and taxes my vocabulary, but good God! It moves like it’s on speed. Things happen, pretty much from the first few pages. Our naif hero d’Artagnan takes offense and challenges a stranger to a duel; the stranger can’t be bothered because of a mysterious plot he’s involved in with the beautiful Milady; d’Artagnan suffers a theft of the thing he most prizes in the world. And that’s all in the first chapter. I don’t know where it’s going, but I can’t wait to get there.

Dumas keeps the reader on a need-to-know-basis, telling us no less than but no more than we need at any particular point in the story, filling us in as things develop. He perfectly illustrates the tried-and-true reliable story mnemonic  ABDCE—Action, Background, Development, Climax, Ending. That formula is usually used to discuss the short story, but it applies just as much to the novel, and to sections within novels: engage readers with action, parcel out just enough background to pique our interest, escalate to some sort of breaking point, get out.

We can all learn a thing or two from that kind of story. Speaking of which, I’m going to get back to it.

Written by Michael

5 March 2009 at 12.57 pm

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. The Three Musketeers, again and again, strikes me as one of the pinnacles of swashbuckling adventure-comic fiction. Each time I pick it up in a bookstore I end up laughing out loud at d’Artagnan’s honor-bound antics. The tangle in the cloak! His horse!

    And you’re right: Dumas is a merciless master of keeping us wanting to know what happens next. Great stuff. It’s not that the story is simple; far from it. But *things happen*, and maybe that’s the key.

    Seth

    6 March 2009 at 9.45 am

    • Thanks for the comment. Yeah, Dumas is a great good time, isn’t he?

      Michael

      6 March 2009 at 11.06 pm

  2. Love this book. Have you read Monte Cristo? I like his quote: “All human wisdom is summed up in two words: wait and hope.” That is the key to getting noticed as a writer :)

    shelli

    13 March 2009 at 11.02 am

  3. Thanks for the great writing AND reading reminder. I’ve been meaning to read Dumas since my Cuba trip years ago. The lector at the Havana Cigar Factory was reading The Count of Monte Cristo to the workers. Rolling cigars, listening to stories… not a bad job, huh?

    Deb Lund

    19 March 2009 at 5.46 pm

  4. I’ve read the Three Musketeers 4 or 5 times and I always find a new favorite part. You should read Monte Cristo for sure. It’s just mind boggling how someone can keep you interested in a guy rotting in prison.

    RichardM

    21 April 2009 at 1.23 pm


Leave a Reply